| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd
''Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd'' () (EWCA Civ 12 ) is an English contract law case, concerning the incorporation of terms into a contract and the ''contra proferentum'' rule of interpretation. It shows an example of a very hostile interpretation of exclusion clauses.
==Facts==
Walter Hollier took his Rambler car to an automobile repair shop, Rambler Motors. He had been to this garage on three or four occasions in the past five years before, and he had usually signed an invoice which said the
"company is not responsible for damage caused by fire to customers’ cars on the premises."
He did not sign the form on this occasion. Unfortunately, some wiring in the garage was faulty. Rambler Motors had negligently failed to inspect or maintain the wiring in the shop. A fire broke out and burnt down the garage, with Hollier's car in it. Hollier sued Rambler Motors for the cost of his car.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|